If this video doesn’t convince everyone of which candidate is best suited to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Services and President of the greatest nation in the world – I don’t know what will.
Obama’s P.O.W. video
—
My father served in the Navy during WWII and later the Army.
He refused to talk about the unspeakably vile things he saw, but they clearly haunted him.
Having read details of McCain’s torture — such as breaking his teeth at the gum line, for starters — watching this video fills me with a sense of indebtedness so overwhelming that I cannot imagine how we as a country could ever repay such men.
At a minimum, their scars seen and unseen should not be campaign fodder.
In 1992 Admiral Stockdale was mocked as McCain’s disabilities and temper are mocked in 2008.
If we are very lucky, President McCain will help restore our national character and honor before it’s too late.
If the title of this offended you, good, it made you watch, read and understand how important it is you do the right thing and vote McCain.
Obama is a fraud, here on a mission from Frank Marshall Davis to change America that John McCain fought so hard for and almost paid the ultimate price.
McCain will not fail us or this country we all love.
For once, vote for the best candidate for America, not for the party you belong to.
McCain / Palin 2008
14 Comments
Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 2:48 pm
My Dad was in Korea and in Nam Twice
then I end up going to universty and they are bombing ROTC Bldgs on campus . Now the SDS mother fukers want to take the Presidency ?
INSANE here from justsaynodeal the PUMA site
some people in the Democratic party are waking up and seeing how thier Party has been stolen
by logistics monster
We Clinton Supporters and bloggers have been viewing the death of the
Democratic Party through the lens of a coup or hostile takeover by its liberal
left wing. We witnessed in disbelief as our party became the party of
violence, sexism, misogyny, racism, thuggery, theft, corruption, caucus
fraud, and voter registration fraud.
Before casting a vote, Centrist Dems and all other Americans must stop
looking at the current Democratic Party through the perception they have of
what the Democratic Party once meant.
that party was dead and buried on may 31, 2008
This is not your grandmother’s left wing (or maybe it is). What is now being
uncovered is that the takeover of the Democratic Party is being
orchestrated by a group of people with socialist/marxist beliefs, with a pinch
of fascism sprinkled in—being led by a hand picked, groomed and marketed
messiah under the guise of “progressivism”—with a belief system that
states the ends justify the means. This may also explain why well over 90%
of the African American population is voting for this candidate, and though
some of it has to do with his race, more may be because of his socialist
philosophy.
barack obama is that hand picked candidate
Hillary Clinton was systematically destroyed by the “Democratic Party” in
the primaries. We may debate her strengths and weaknesses as a
candidate, but not being part of the ‘master plan’, she was quite simply
irrelevant.
On the other hand, Barack was spoon fed his current core beliefs for
decades, and is a willing participant in the downfall of America as you know
it. The candidate who has shattered all fund raising records, is now deeply
in political debt to his radical associations.
It’s time to understand where this “alien” democratic party is heading with
Obama in the foreground and his numerous radical socialist/marxist
associates in the background.
let’s start with a history lesson :
Democratic Party:
When political alignments first emerged in George Washington’s
administration, opposing factions were led by Alexander Hamilton and
Thomas Jefferson. In the basic disagreement over the nature and functions
of government and of society, the Jeffersonians advocated a society based
on the small farmer; they opposed strong centralized government and were
suspicious of urban commercial interests. Their ideals—opposed to those
of the Federalist Party — came to be known as Jeffersonian democracy,
based in large part on faith in the virtue and ability of the common man and
the limitation of the powers of the federal government. This group of Anti-
Federalists, who called themselves Republicans or Democratic Republicans
(the name was not fixed as Democratic until 1828), supported many of the
ideals of the French Revolution and opposed close relations with Great
Britain.
Progressive Party:
U.S. independent political party. The first Progressive Party, known as the
Bull Moose Party, was organized in 1911. The second was assembled in
1924; it nominated as its presidential candidate Robert La Follette, who
received 17% of the national vote on a platform calling for a
“housecleaning” of executive departments, public control of natural
resources, public ownership of the railways, and tax reduction. The party
dissolved upon La Follette’s death in 1925. The third Progressive Party,
founded in 1947 by Henry Wallace, differed from the previous groups in its
focus on foreign affairs; it favoured a conciliatory policy toward the Soviet
Union. Though Wallace received more than one million votes in the 1948
election, the party was never again influential.
Progressivism:
The term “progressive” is today often used in place of “liberal“. Although
the two are related in some ways, they are separate and distinct political
ideologies. According to John Halpin, senior advisor on the staff of the
Center for American Progress, “Progressivism is an orientation towards
politics, It’s not a long-standing ideology like liberalism, but an historically-
grounded concept… that accepts the world as dynamic.” Progressives see
progressivism as an attitude towards the world of politics that is broader
than conservatism vs. liberalism, and as an attempt to break free from what
they consider to be a false and divisive dichotomy.
American progressives tend to support interventionist economics: they
advocate income redistribution, and they oppose the growing influence of
corporations. Conversely, European and Australian progressives tend to be
more pro-business, and will often have policies that are soft on taxation of
large corporations. Progressives are in agreement on an international scale
with left-liberalism in that they support organized labor and trade unions,
they usually wish to introduce a living wage, and they often support the
creation of a universal health care system. Yet progressives tend to be more
concerned with environmentalism than mainstream liberals, and are often
more skeptical of the government, positioning themselves as
whistleblowers and advocates of governmental reform. Finally, liberals are
more likely to support the Democratic Party in America and the Labour party
in Europe and Australia, while progressives tend to feel disillusioned with
any two-party system, and vote more often for third-party candidates.
Socialism:
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the
means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a
centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and
communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the
dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.
Socialism (in the strict or radical sense) aims to establish a fundamentally
different society from the one that currently exists in most countries. While
there are different schools of socialism, which often tend to have differing
views of the ideal socialist society, some general examples of socialist
concepts are: The desire to abolish capitalism, to place the means of
productionexploits the working class, and they desire for workers to play a
vital role in moving society from capitalism to socialism (either by rising up
in a revolution or general strike, or by voting en masse for socialist political
parties). under the collective ownership of the people, and to achieve a very
high degree of economic and political equality. Socialists argue that
capitalism
In contrast, by definition progressivism aims to achieve gradual social
change, and most progressives are outright opposed to any form of radical
revolution. When the progressive movement split on economic principles,
some progressives moved towards the socialist camp, advocating a
planned economy. Other progressives moved towards the regulated mixed
economy camp, with both public and private ownership of companies.
Between these two extremes is social democracy (not a term in popular U.
S. usage), a branch of socialism that became increasingly moderate and
moved towards the political center. Regulated-capitalism progressives and
socialist progressives still tend to support similar progressive social
policies, outside of economic principles.
Communism:
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership
of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all
members.
2. Communism
a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the
economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to
make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally
shared by the people.
b. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the
overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
National Socialism, Naziism, Nazism:
national socialism, Naziism, Nazism – a form of socialism featuring racism
and expansionism and obedience to a strong leader
German history the doctrines and practices of the Nazis, involving the
supremacy of Hitler, anti-Semitism, state control of the economy, and
national expansion
The ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist
nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy.
Capitalism:
An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are
privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the
accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.
An economic system based on private ownership of the means of
production, in which personal profit can be acquired through investment of
capital and employment of labor. Capitalism is grounded in the concept of
free enterprise, which argues that government intervention in the economy
should be restricted and that a free market, based on supply and demand,
will ultimately maximize consumer welfare.
now that you’ve read those definitions…
Is it not apparent to you that the Democratic Party is now the Progressive
Socialist Party? Income redistribution, universal health care, nationalization
of the economy through our banks, centralized government, and a drive to
destroy the free market capitalist system upon which our nation was built.
remember these words uttered by obama?
“When you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
“It’s no secret that most Americans think the country is on the wrong track”
“But the reason isn’t just failed policies. It’s a system in Washington that
has failed the American people. A system that has not kept the most
fundamental trust of American democracy; that our government is of the
people, and that it must govern for all the people – not just the interests of
the wealthy and well-connected.”
“We don’t need the people, we just need their checks.”
it’s the associations stupid
All one has to do is put the pieces together starting with William Ayers,
Obama’s most publicized associate with radical beliefs and actions, and
leading to Bernadine Dohrn, Michelle Obama, Marilyn Katz, Frank Marshall
Davis, Alice Palmer, George Soros, Jim Johnson, Franklin Raines, Carl
Davidson, Robert Blackwell, Tony Rezko, Dorothy Tillman, Robert Malley,
Cornel West, Howard Dean, Donna Brazille, Nancy Pelosi, MoveOn.org,
Center for American Progress, Open Society Institute, Arab American Action
Network, The Democracy Alliance, The New Party, the Democratic Socialist
Party, The Working Families Party, Socialist Scholars Conference,
Campaign for America’s Future, The Progressive Caucus, Public Allies,
ACORN, Citizens Services, Inc., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ken Rolling, The
Woods Fund, The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, The Joyce Foundation,
Gamaliel Foundation, Students For A Democratic Society, Saul Alinsky,
Richard Andrew Cloward, Frances Fox Piven, Zbigniew Brzenzinski, Penny
Pritzker, The Superior Bank, The Broadway Bank, Louis Farrakhan and the
Nation of Islam, Reverend Wright, Rather Pfleuger, Raila Odinga of Kenya,
Rashid Khalidi, Nadhmi Auchi and only halting at Fusion Elections because
more has not yet come to light.
if you head is spinning or about to explode…
just take a few breaths and notes if need be; it will become clear enough
that this campaign to remake the Democratic Party into the Progressive
Socialist Party has been in the making for well over 20 years by Saul Alinksy
and his students: radical socialist and Columbia University professors,
Richard Cloward, the Godfather of the movement, and Frances Fox Piven.
the cloward-piven strategy of orchestrated crisis
First elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of
radical socialist Columbia University professors, writer David Horowitz
summarizes it as:
The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The
“Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by
overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible
demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer Saul Alinsky:
“Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in
his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of
every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit
promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short.
The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to
discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a
socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)
Their strategy was to create political, financial, and social chaos that would
result in a revolution and a forced change in the U.S. Government. To
achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven used a cadre of
aggressive community organizers assisted by friendly news media to force
a re-distribution of the nation’s wealth.
sound familiar?
In their Nation article, Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of
“crisis” they were trying to create:
By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere.
Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of
tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional
disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.
No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following
features:
The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for
government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems,
with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.
speaking of nuts, how does acorn fit it?
In 1970, a young man named Wade Rathke – also a compatriot of Bill Ayers –
sought to broaden that offensive. A disciple of Saul Alinsky and member of
the 60’s radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) — Rathke was
sent to start up the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now.
The group added low income “rights” to their reportoire in an effort to
expand its base. In pursuit of that expansion, “Arkansas” was changed to
“Association of” and a nationwide ACORN was born.
enter 2008 and a presidential election
Today ACORN is involved in a wide array of activities, including housing,
voting rights, illegal immigration and other issues. According to ACORN’s
website: “ACORN is the nation’s largest grassroots community organization
of low-and moderate-income people with over 400,000 member families
organized into more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in 110 cities across
the country,” It is perhaps the largest radical group in the U.S. and has been
cited for widespread criminal activity on many fronts. (Let’s not get ahead of
the whole story though.)
By now, if you do not know that William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn are
domestic terrorists and founders of the Weather Underground that bombed
American targets, you need to come out of the wilderness and pay attention
to the current political situation. Barack (and possibly Michelle) have been
involved with the Ayers for more than 20 years starting in 1985 with the
Woods Fund. Also be aware that the Woods Fund has given grants to
ACORN, Rashid Khalidi and Trinity United Church.
we’re almost done…stay with us
The Woods Fund financed the hiring of Obama in 1985 by the Developing
Communities Project. According to The Nation: “The Woods Fund, in many
ways, is responsible for helping start Obama as an organizer and shaping
his political identity. In 1985 the foundation gave a $25,000 grant to the
Developing Communities Project (aka the “DCP”), which hired Obama, at
24, as an organizer on Chicago’s economically depressed South Side.”
The Woods Fund was founded by the Woods family which owned the
Illinois-based Sahara Coal Company, a major supplier of coal from its mines
to major Illinois power companies. Commonwealth Edison, the giant
Chicago-based electric power company was headed by Thomas Ayers,
father of Bill Ayers.
Obama served on the board of the Woods Fund from 1993 until 2002. Bill
Ayers joined the board of the Fund in 1999 and continues to serve on the
board today. He chaired the board for two years during that time.
Another strand in this massive spiderweb is Ken Rolling, introduced here,
and also the person behind the cleaning and containment of the Annenberg
papers when Stanley Kurtz was originally investigating the Ayers/Obama
connection.
Obama’s Developing Communities Project (DCP) supported radical school
reform project in conjunction with Bill Ayers.
In 1987 in the wake of a controversial strike by the Chicago Teachers’
Union, the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools, or ABCs, was formed to
lobby for a new Illinois law that would mandate the establishment of a new
power center in Chicago public schools. Local school councils would be
established to watchdog union teachers and their principals and they would
have the power to fire principals at will.
Bill Ayers was a contact person for the ABCs (although we do not know
precisely when he attained this position) and later its chair. Barack Obama
worked on school reform efforts for the DCP at that time, the DCP played a
leading role in the school reform effort and the DCP was a member of the
ABCs. Chicago United, a business group established by Tom Ayers, Bill’s
father, was also a leading organizer of and member of the ABCs.
The Woods Fund also provided additional financial support to the DCP in
1988 to support its school reform efforts. A program officer of the Woods
Fund at the time was Ken Rolling who would later be hired by Bill Ayers and
Barack Obama as Executive Director of the $110 million Chicago Annenberg
Challenge.
maybe u should grab some more coffee
An informative WSJ article explains that Bill Ayers has not changed his
radical thinking; it has morphed over into teaching our teachers how to
produce radical thinking children. Ayers Is No Education ‘Reformer’.
One of the most misleading statements during the presidential debates was
when Barack Obama claimed that William Ayers was just “a guy in the
neighborhood.”
But that piece of spin is nothing compared to the false story now being
peddled by Mr. Obama’s media supporters that Mr. Ayers — who worked
with the Democratic nominee for years to disperse education grants
through a group called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge — has redeemed
his terrorist past.
[snip]
I’ve studied Mr. Ayers’s work for years and read most of his books. His
hatred of America is as virulent as when he planted a bomb at the
Pentagon. And this hatred informs his educational “reform” efforts. Of
course, Mr. Obama isn’t going to appoint him to run the education
department. But the media mainstreaming of a figure like Mr. Ayers could
have terrible consequences for the country’s politics and public schools.
The education career of William Ayers began when he enrolled at Columbia
University’s Teachers College at the age of 40. He planned to stay long
enough to get a teaching credential. But he experienced an epiphany in a
course offered by Maxine Greene, who urged future teachers to tell children
about the evils of the existing, oppressive capitalist social order. In her
essay “In Search of a Critical Pedagogy,” for example, Ms. Greene wrote of
an education that would portray “homelessness as a consequence of the
private dealings of landlords, an arms buildup as a consequence of
corporate decisions, racial exclusion as a consequence of a private property-
holder’s choice.”
That was music to the ears of the ex-Weatherman. Mr. Ayers acquired a
doctorate in education and landed an Ed school appointment at the
University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC).
[snip]
In this Chicago, where there are no enemies on the left, Mr. Ayers’s second
career flourished. It didn’t hurt that his father, Thomas Ayers, was the CEO
of the Commonwealth Edison company, a friend of both Daleys and a major
power broker in the city.
Mr. Ayers was hired by the Chicago public schools to train teachers, and
played a leading role in the $160 million Annenberg Challenge grant that
distributed funds to a host of so-called school-reform projects, including
some social-justice themed schools and schools organized by Acorn.
Barack Obama became the first chairman of the board of the Chicago
Annenberg Challenge organization in 1995. When asked for an opinion on
the Obama/Ayers connection, Mayor Daley told the New York Times that Mr.
Ayers had “done a lot of good in this city and nationally.”
In fact, as one of the leaders of a movement for bringing radical social-
justice teaching into our public school classrooms, Mr. Ayers is not a school
reformer. He is a school destroyer.
He still hopes for a revolutionary upheaval that will finally bring down
American capitalism and imperialism, but this time around Mr. Ayers sows
the seeds of resistance and rebellion in America’s future teachers.
Back to Ken Rolling; the donor that wanted to examine the records prior to
the release.
As Global Labor readers are well aware the University of Illinois at Chicago
denied Stanley Kurtz of National Review access to the official records of the
Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the six-year-long $160 million education
reform project led by, among others, Barack Obama and Bill Ayers.
The denial of access to the archives of the CAC was unusual and possibly
illegal. It was done after the University, again without any legal justification
that I am aware of, contacted someone they said was the “donor” of the
records. That “donor” wanted to examine the records prior to their release
to the public.
This is highly unusual in light of the fact that the records had been
deposited with UIC in 2002 and had been processed by UIC librarians and
made ready for access by researchers. Only when Mr. Kurtz, a
conservative, requested that he be allowed to see them was the “donor”
contacted.
Thanks to the diligent efforts of a 3rd year law student in Chicago who filed
a Freedom of Information Act request with UIC, Global Labor can reveal
tonight that the alleged “donor” who was contacted by UIC and who tried to
block Dr. Kurtz’ access to the CAC records was Ken Rolling, former
Executive Director of the CAC and a former staff member of the Woods
Fund in the 1980s when the Woods Fund provided financial support to the
Developing Communities Project which was then headed up by Barack
Obama.
Thus, someone with a 20 year history with Senator Obama was tipped off in
advance and in secret by a public University about the interest of a political
opponent of the Senator in these public records. The CAC was a non profit
corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois to serve the
interests of the people of Illinois. Of course, Ken Rolling now has no legally
cognizable interest that I am aware of in the long defunct CAC. Legally, the
successor organization to the CAC is the Chicago Public Education Fund,
on whose board sits Obama Campaign Finance Chair Penny Pritzker and
Obama supporter Susan Crown. (Do you recognize that name; Penny
Pritzker of the Superior Bank Sub-prime Mortgage Meltdown?)
u ready to shoot urself yet? i am ;-)
Obama and Dohrn worked for elite law firm Sidley and Austin
After surfacing from the Weather Underground in 1980 Bernardine Dohrn,
wife of Bill Ayers, pled guilty to criminal charges related to the violent Days
of Rage in Chicago in 1969 and received three years probation. She later
refused to testify in front of a grand jury convened to investigate a bank
robbery carried out by former comrades of Dohrn’s from the Weather
Underground. Currently a clinical faculty member at Northwestern
University School of Law, she told the New York Times that she thought
grand juries were “illegal” and “coercive.” She served seven months in jail.
Because of the criminal convictions Dohrn, who received a law degree from
the University of Chicago in 1967, was refused admission to the New York
bar. Nonetheless, she was hired as a legal clerk by Sidley and Austin, a
major Chicago law firm, in their New York office in 1984. Howard Trienens,
then managing partner of the firm, recently told the Chicago Tribune that he
arranged the hiring of Dohrn as a favor to his fellow Northwestern
University trustee and classmate, Tom Ayers. Tom Ayers’ firm,
Commonwealth Edison, has used Sidley as outside counsel for many years.
She later worked in their Chicago office when she and Bill Ayers moved
back to Chicago in 1987. She left Sidley in 1988.
Enter Khalid Abdullah Tariqu al-Mansour:
Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour is a Muslim lawyer and a black nationalist
who made news in 2008 when it was revealed that he had been a patron of
Barack Obama and had recommended the latter for admission to Harvard
Law School in 1988.
Before becoming a Muslim, al-Mansour in the 1960s was named Don
Warden. He was deeply involved in San Francisco Bay Area racial politics
as founder of a group called the African American Association. A close
personal adviser to Huey Newton and Bobby Seale, al-Mansour helped the
pair establish the Black Panther Party but later broke with them when they
entered coalitions with white radical groups.
[snip]
Al-Mansour is an outspoken hater of the United States, Israel, and white
people generally. In recent years he has accused the U.S. of plotting a
“genocide” designed “to remove 15 million black people, considered
disposable, of no relevance, value or benefit to the American society.”…
There is more information at the link, but I could not bring myself to reprint
it, and yet, it may explain why Barack Obama and Reverend Wright are so
close.
Steve Diamond:
Chicago lefty lawyer and Dohrn classmate Judson Miner hires Barack
Obama out of Harvard.
Barack Obama returned to Harvard after his summer at Sidley and Austin in
the fall of 1989. That academic year he was elected the president of the
Harvard Law Review, the first black person to hold the position. Although
Obama could have returned to Sidley or perhaps clerked for the United
States Supreme Court, a natural step for Law Review officers, he chose
instead to work for Judson Miner, a partner in a small civil rights law firm in
Chicago. Miner had been counsel to Chicago’s late black mayor, Harold
Washington. Miner was also classmates with Bernardine Dohrn at the
University of Chicago law school in 1967 where they were both were
involved in anti-war activity.
Barack Obama became the first African-American president of the Harvard
Law Review, yet as editor, no evidence of written or published papers has
been uncovered to date, as would be required of the editor.
that annenberg thing
the connection between the Obamas and the Ayers started in 1985 as far as
anyone can seem to ascertain. But it really revved into high hear with the
Chicago Annenberg Challenge, spearheaded by William Ayers.
In late 1993, Bill Ayers, now an associate professor of education at the
University of Illinois Chicago Circle Campus, organized a team to put
together a grant proposal to secure nearly $50 million from the Annenberg
Foundation. The money was to be used by Ayers to bolster the radical
Local School Councils reform project that Ayers and Obama had
championed back in 1988.
The grant application was successful and in early 1995, Barack Obama was
named chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Ayers
was named co-chair of the Challenge’s operative and strategic body, the
Chicago School Reform Collaborative. Ayers and Obama work together for
the next five years on raising an additional $60 million in matching money
from local foundations and corporations and using the money to intervene
in the governance of the Chicago public schools.
snip
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge paid for a team headquartered at the
University of Chicago to assess the impact of the more than $100 million
they spent in Chicago public schools over that six year period,1995-2001.
Their conclusion in a 250 page 2003 report was that the money had no
impact at all: test scores in schools that received money from Annenberg
went up, but at the same rate as all other schools in Chicago. There was, in
the words of the report, “no Annenberg effect.” For Barack Obama, chairing
“CAC” was one of the only true executive experiences he’s had, yet by all
accounts, it was considered a flop.
lovebirds of a feather …
Barack met Michelle in 1989 while they were both at Sidley Austin. They
were married in October 1992, and according to Investor’s Business Daily,
Barack Obama is the founding member of Public Allies and Michelle became
the executive director of the Chicago Chapter. This is where the beginnings
of their socialist views started to come to light.
Barack Obama was a founding member of the board of Public Allies in 1992,
resigning before his wife became executive director of the Chicago chapter
of Public Allies in 1993. Obama plans to use the nonprofit group, which he
features on his campaign Web site, as the model for a national service
corps. He calls his Orwellian program, “Universal Voluntary Public Service.”
Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth
into government-funded reeducation camps where they’ll be brainwashed
into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of “social
change.”
The pitch Public Allies makes on its Web site doesn’t seem all that radical. It
promises to place young adults (18-30) in paid one-year “community
leadership” positions with nonprofit or government agencies. They’ll also
be required to attend weekly training workshops and three retreats.
In exchange, they’ll get a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health
and child care. They also get a post-service education award of $4,725 that
can be used to pay off past student loans or fund future education.
But its real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring
about “social change” through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation
— the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul “The Red”
Alinsky.
“Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to . . . engage in
protest activities,” Public Allies boasts in a document found with its tax
filings. It has already deployed an army of 2,200 community organizers like
Obama to agitate for “justice” and “equality” in his hometown of Chicago
and other U.S. cities, including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, New
York, Phoenix, Pittsburgh and Washington. “I get to practice being an
activist,” and get paid for it, gushed Cincinnati recruit Amy Vincent.
Public Allies promotes “diversity and inclusion,” a program paper says.
More than 70% of its recruits are “people of color.” When they’re not
protesting, they’re staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing
criminals out of jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food
stamps and other welfare.
Public Allies brags that more than 80% of graduates have continued
working in nonprofit or government jobs. It’s training the “next generation
of nonprofit leaders” — future “social entrepreneurs.”
The Obamas discourage work in the private sector. “Don’t go into
corporate America,” Michelle has exhorted youth. “Work for the community.
Be social workers.” Shun the “money culture,” Barack added. “Individual
salvation depends on collective salvation.”
Also during this time in his life, Barack directed the Illinois’ Project Vote
(April to October 1992). Enter ACORN and Midwest Academy, besides
being part of the Shadow Party are funded, among others, by the Woods
Fund of Chicago, and George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Allow me to
back up just a bit here though. According to Discover The Networks:
who trained u, mr. obama?
Obama was trained by the Saul Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation
(IAF) in Chicago. (The Developing Communities Project itself was an affiliate
of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of “a
more just and democratic society” is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method.)
Alinsky was known for helping to establish the aggressive political tactics
that characterized the 1960s and have remained central to all subsequent
revolutionary movements in the United States.
In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a
wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition
of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the
radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal
is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos
to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted — a
revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and
wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle
for nothing less than that status quo’s complete collapse — to be followed
by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins. Toward that end,
they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who
project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly
understand what types of societal “changes” are needed.
But Alinsky’s brand of revolution was not characterized by dramatic,
sweeping, overnight transformations of social institutions. As Richard Poe
puts it, “Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was
to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political
parties.” Alinsky advised organizers and their disciples to quietly, subtly
gain influence within the decision-making ranks of these institutions, and to
introduce changes from that platform.
One of Obama’s early mentors in the Alinsky method, Mike Kruglik, would
later say the following about Obama:
“He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a
room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them
to admit that they were not living up to their own standards. As with the
panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing,
sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their
lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope
that they could make things better.”
For several years, Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.
okay, now back to acorn and our ‘almost prez’
ACORN, Project Vote and Barack Obama:
Beginning in the mid-1980s, Obama worked with ACORN, a creation of the
Alinsky network. ACORN was a grassroots political organization that grew
out of George Wiley’s National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), whose
members in the late 1960s and early 70s had invaded welfare offices across
the U.S. — often violently — bullying social workers and loudly demanding
every penny to which the law “entitled” them.[2]
Obama also worked for Project Vote, the voter-mobilization arm of ACORN.
Project Vote’s professed purpose is to carry out “non-partisan” voter-
registration drives; to counsel voters on their rights; and to litigate on behalf
of voting rights — focusing on the rights of the poor and the
“disenfranchised.”[3] Obama was the attorney for ACORN’s lead election-
law cases, and he worked as a trainer at ACORN’s annual conferences,
where he taught members of the organization the art of radical community
organizing.
[snip]
Also in 1995, Obama sued, on behalf of ACORN, for the implementation of
the Motor Voter law in Illinois. Jim Edgar, the state’s Republican Governor,
opposed the law because he believed that allowing voters to register using
only a postcard would breed widespread fraud.
ACORN would later invite Obama to help train its staff. Moreover, Obama
eventually would sit on the Board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, which
gave a number of sizable grants to ACORN.
boy ur a quick study
Completely confused yet? Curious about the Shadow Party? Please do not
say I did not warn you at the start of this journey….
The “Shadow Party” is a term originally devised by journalists to describe
527 political committees promoting Democratic Party agendas. It is here
used more specifically to refer to the network of non-profit activist groups
organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources – money, get-
out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising and policy iniatives – to elect
Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left.
The Internet fund-raising operation MoveOn.org is a key component. The
Shadow Party in this sense was conceived and organized principally by
Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes. Its efforts are amplified by, and
coordinated with, key government unions and the activist groups
associated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform
Now (ACORN). The key organizers of these groups are veterans of the
Sixties left.
what about this marxism thing?
Barack starts his political career with the help
of the endorsement of
The New Party:
(pic: Obama shown here with The New Party
click to expand)
Marxist political coalition
Active from 1992-1998
Endorsed Barack Obama
in 1996 for the Illinois State Senate
this is especially relevant if u watched hannity last night
Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson’s
1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor
at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist
political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public
officials – most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was
to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the
eventual rise of new Marxist third party.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America
and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also
included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a
Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA
members.
The New Party’s modus operandi included the political strategy of “electoral
fusion,” where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates
from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those
candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so
doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates (Fusion of this
type is permitted in seven states — Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho,
Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont — but is common only
in New York.)
the Justsay nodeal PUMa website
Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Ya know… I couldn’t have put that any better.
Sunday, October 26, 2008 at 6:48 am
Obama is a communist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr9y0fagSOs
The Frankfurt School an into
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIec2vAPMaM&feature=related
The Frankfurt School a full history
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il6HTYhetzI&feature=related
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bylQI-bpiS4&feature=related
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bkcG6RaA5M&feature=related
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQiWUluDI5Y&feature=related
Obama is a communist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tISe-zEWN9M
Ronald Reagan on Socialism and Liberalism
Sunday, October 26, 2008 at 9:06 am
You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. I first ran across this list 3 years ago but was unable to attain a copy and it has bothered me ever since. Recently, Jeff Rense posted it on his site and I would like to thank him for doing so. http://www.rense.com
Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963
Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .
Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
Sunday, October 26, 2008 at 11:30 am
Red Dawn
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-712036695027727306
Wolverines !
Our Nation will never be wiped of the face of the earth! We will stand!
Friday, October 31, 2008 at 9:59 am
Looks like McCain is going to win Florida. Early voting reports for the exit polls shows voters electing McCain over Obama 49% to 45%. Reports from Pennsylvania show McCain gaining ground in that state. Obama is ahead by only 3 points. Reports from Israel absentee vote goes for McCain 3 to 1. This report might show the same Jewish vote pattern shitfing toward McCain.
This might be headed to a Truman-Dewey surprise.
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 10:15 am
McCain’s POW video :
The answer of Youtube is : We’re sorry, this video is no longer available.
It is the same thing on other blogs ; Youtube does not like this video :-(
Do you have another one ?
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 7:20 pm
OBAMA 08!!!
Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 10:25 am
Fuck Christain mama
Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 9:56 am
DONT HATE ON MY MAN BARACK,IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE WE GOT OUR OPPORTUNITY.WE DID IN GOLF,BASEBALL,AND BASKETBALL,YOU SAW WHAT HAPPEN.NOW WATCH BO PUT THIS COUNTRY IN A BETTER POSITION THAN BEFORE HE GOT INTO OFFICE.
Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 3:15 pm
@laverall?:
Often times in the business world timeliness is an important attribute. When actually holding a position for which you receive pay, commonly referred to as a “job” (I explain as this is a term with which you are not likely familiar) it is occasionally important to observe timeliness, for example showing up when expected, or performing tasks when still relevant, unlike your reply here.
I am sure “Obama gots yo’ back” and all, but even your minority supervisors may at some point require you to be a smidge more timely than your reply to this post.
I understand, the “fohties”, “blunts”, and certainly all those “bitchiz and ho’z” keep you very busy, along with sleeping, hating whitey, watching the aforementioned sporting events on “yo’ bling-azz plazma”, cleaning those automobile rims that spin around”, and especially cashing welfare checks.
The real issue you and “your Man Barack” will still have to “git real wif” is the small problem of once we all figure out the government is going to pay for our gas and mortgages, who is going to foot that bill?
Hey, good luck with your well thought out plan for your life.
Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 3:53 pm
Amazing.
Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 5:07 pm
A better position to do what…screw us all…including your dumb butt….
Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 6:22 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSHHKpnFTU8
I made that when I still had hope. :-\