<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MUST SEE: How idiot Joe reacts to tough questions. Laugh at the person then file a complain that she was combative and unprofessional. WOW.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/</link>
	<description>Political News of America&#039;s Idiot Puppet @ http://www.obambi.com/</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Akira</title>
		<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/#comment-5302</link>
		<dc:creator>Akira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obambi.wordpress.com/?p=6127#comment-5302</guid>
		<description>Rough notes re dismissal of Philip Berg case:

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/rough-notes-re-dismissal-of-berg-case/

What Obama could be trying to hide:

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/what-could-obama-be-trying-to-hide/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rough notes re dismissal of Philip Berg case:</p>
<p><a href="http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/rough-notes-re-dismissal-of-berg-case/" rel="nofollow">http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/rough-notes-re-dismissal-of-berg-case/</a></p>
<p>What Obama could be trying to hide:</p>
<p><a href="http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/what-could-obama-be-trying-to-hide/" rel="nofollow">http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/what-could-obama-be-trying-to-hide/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mb</title>
		<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/#comment-5296</link>
		<dc:creator>mb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obambi.wordpress.com/?p=6127#comment-5296</guid>
		<description>I wish more people would ask &quot;hard&quot; questions to all involved in politics.  We deserve to know who Barack Obama is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish more people would ask &#8220;hard&#8221; questions to all involved in politics.  We deserve to know who Barack Obama is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obambi.wordpress.com/?p=6127#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>Oh, Barb, why not the really hard question.... about the Obama/Biden plan to DRAFT all men/women 18-42 in the name of &quot;National Service&quot;?    And even retired professional seniors to work in underpriviliged areas &quot;as defined by Congress&quot;?  
You laid it out for Tim Russert in 2005, Joe..

http://www.theage.com.au/news/Iraq/US-contemplates-mlitary-draft/2005/06/13/1118514951988.html 

Rangel brings it up constantly:  
Universal National Service Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)[H.R.2723.IH ]
Universal National Service Act of 2006 (Introduced in House)[H.R.4752.IH ]
Universal National Service Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)[H.R.393.IH ]
Universal National Service Act of 2003 (Introduced in House)[H.R.163.IH ]
  
And , 
 Universal National Service Act of 2003 (Introduced in Senate)[S.89.IS ]

108th CONGRESS

1st Session

S . 89 
To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes. 


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 7, 2003
Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

Let&#039;s see, Senator Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC).  

Seems the only draft alarmists have a big &quot;D&quot; after their names!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Barb, why not the really hard question&#8230;. about the Obama/Biden plan to DRAFT all men/women 18-42 in the name of &#8220;National Service&#8221;?    And even retired professional seniors to work in underpriviliged areas &#8220;as defined by Congress&#8221;?<br />
You laid it out for Tim Russert in 2005, Joe..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/Iraq/US-contemplates-mlitary-draft/2005/06/13/1118514951988.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theage.com.au/news/Iraq/US-contemplates-mlitary-draft/2005/06/13/1118514951988.html</a> </p>
<p>Rangel brings it up constantly:<br />
Universal National Service Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)[H.R.2723.IH ]<br />
Universal National Service Act of 2006 (Introduced in House)[H.R.4752.IH ]<br />
Universal National Service Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)[H.R.393.IH ]<br />
Universal National Service Act of 2003 (Introduced in House)[H.R.163.IH ]</p>
<p>And ,<br />
 Universal National Service Act of 2003 (Introduced in Senate)[S.89.IS ]</p>
<p>108th CONGRESS</p>
<p>1st Session</p>
<p>S . 89<br />
To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes. </p>
<p>IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES</p>
<p>January 7, 2003<br />
Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, Senator Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC).  </p>
<p>Seems the only draft alarmists have a big &#8220;D&#8221; after their names!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obambi.wordpress.com/?p=6127#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>Akira I wish it was true but on Beckwith&#039;s Obama file they said the judge threw out the case.
Berg may have to go to a higher court but we saw how the Supreme Court ruled in the Ohio Voter Fraud case.Kiss America Goodbye as we knew it.

Judge rejects Montco lawyer&#039;s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News

hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg&#039;s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg&#039;s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg&#039;s claims were &quot;ridiculous&quot; and &quot;patently false,&quot; that Berg had &quot;no standing&quot; to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg&#039;s allegations of harm were &quot;too vague and too attenuated&quot; to confer standing on him or any other voters.

Surrick ruled that Berg&#039;s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were &quot;frivolous and not worthy of discussion.&quot;

The judge also said the harm Berg alleged did &quot;not constitute an injury in fact&quot; and Berg&#039;s arguments to the contrary &quot;ventured into the unreasonable.&quot;

For example, Berg had claimed that Obama&#039;s nomination deprived citizens of voting for Sen. Hillary Clinton in November. (Berg backed Clinton in the primaries.)

Berg could not be reached for comment last night.

Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, and the campaign posted a document issued by Hawaii on its Web site, fight thesmears.com, confirming his birth there.

Berg said in court papers that the image was a forgery.

The nonpartisan Web site FactCheck.org examined the original document and said it was legitimate.

Further, a birth announcement in the Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listed Obama&#039;s birth there on Aug. 4. *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akira I wish it was true but on Beckwith&#8217;s Obama file they said the judge threw out the case.<br />
Berg may have to go to a higher court but we saw how the Supreme Court ruled in the Ohio Voter Fraud case.Kiss America Goodbye as we knew it.</p>
<p>Judge rejects Montco lawyer&#8217;s bid to have Obama removed from ballot<br />
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN<br />
Philadelphia Daily News</p>
<p><a href="mailto:hinkelm@phillynews.com">hinkelm@phillynews.com</a> 215-854-2656</p>
<p>A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.<br />
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.</p>
<p>Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.</p>
<p>He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.</p>
<p>U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg&#8217;s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg&#8217;s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.</p>
<p>They said that Berg&#8217;s claims were &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; and &#8220;patently false,&#8221; that Berg had &#8220;no standing&#8221; to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.</p>
<p>Surrick agreed.</p>
<p>In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg&#8217;s allegations of harm were &#8220;too vague and too attenuated&#8221; to confer standing on him or any other voters.</p>
<p>Surrick ruled that Berg&#8217;s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were &#8220;frivolous and not worthy of discussion.&#8221;</p>
<p>The judge also said the harm Berg alleged did &#8220;not constitute an injury in fact&#8221; and Berg&#8217;s arguments to the contrary &#8220;ventured into the unreasonable.&#8221;</p>
<p>For example, Berg had claimed that Obama&#8217;s nomination deprived citizens of voting for Sen. Hillary Clinton in November. (Berg backed Clinton in the primaries.)</p>
<p>Berg could not be reached for comment last night.</p>
<p>Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, and the campaign posted a document issued by Hawaii on its Web site, fight thesmears.com, confirming his birth there.</p>
<p>Berg said in court papers that the image was a forgery.</p>
<p>The nonpartisan Web site FactCheck.org examined the original document and said it was legitimate.</p>
<p>Further, a birth announcement in the Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listed Obama&#8217;s birth there on Aug. 4. *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akira</title>
		<link>http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/joeblows/#comment-5281</link>
		<dc:creator>Akira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obambi.wordpress.com/?p=6127#comment-5281</guid>
		<description>These two are just such bizarre characters.

I have a better slogan for them than &quot;CHANGE WE NEED&quot;

How about &quot;VOTE 4 B.J.&quot; Of course I mean Barack &amp; Joe.

What&#039;s up with this:

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/is-this-for-real-judge-orders-obama-to-be-removed-from-ballots/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two are just such bizarre characters.</p>
<p>I have a better slogan for them than &#8220;CHANGE WE NEED&#8221;</p>
<p>How about &#8220;VOTE 4 B.J.&#8221; Of course I mean Barack &amp; Joe.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s up with this:</p>
<p><a href="http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/is-this-for-real-judge-orders-obama-to-be-removed-from-ballots/" rel="nofollow">http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/is-this-for-real-judge-orders-obama-to-be-removed-from-ballots/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
