Larry Sinclair interview

LARRY SINCLAIR BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON BHO

• Posted by GRINGO LUCERO on February 22, 2012 at 4:57pm
• View Blog

Untold Story of BO – A MUST Know – Could be our key
http://larrysinclair.com/

The problem is the Obama campaign retaliated against every one of these outlets almost immediately by using Daily Kos and Democratic
Underground. On October 3 of 2008, Obama did a campaign appearance in Grand Rapid Michigan. I was there and less than a hundred
feet from him. I had a mega phone and I kept asking him from the megaphone if he would bother to tell people where he was at on
November 6 and 7, 1999. The people at that campaign rally were ready to kill me.

EXCLUSIVE UNTOLD STORY !
Larry Sinclair vs. Obama !!!

Interview Conducted By Chris Anu
New Hampshire Herald

What Does Obama Know About Donald Young’s Murder?

Herald: Larry, if we may go back to the story of Donald Young, you said you spoke to him in September and then in December he was killed?

Larry: No! No! The communication between me and Young started ‘07’ and it went through early December of ’07’ and then it stopped. It turns out that Young was murdered on December 23rd of 2007.

Herald: We’ve not read about him that much. Was his death investigated?

Larry: Well his death according to Chicago authorities is still under investigation. On December 27, 2007, there was a comment posted on the Black Entertainment Television (BET) message board in Chicago and the message said that they hoped that Obama and Young’s relationship didn’t make people think that Obama was involved in his murder.

Herald: Did you read that yourself or someone told you about it?

Larry: No! No! No! I saw the comment that was posted on the BET message board and it is in my book. I actually published the comment and the BET URL where the comment was posted. Shortly after Donald Young was killed, the Chicago media said that there were a couple of people in the community that started complaining, saying that they thought they had a serial killer who was targeting openly gay black men on the Chicago Southside. Then local television and newspapers reported it for about two days then they stopped. It was like all of a sudden there was no concern about a serial killer. It turned out that another gentleman that used to go to Jeremiah Wright’s church every now and then by the name of Larry Bland was murdered in a break in, in his house in November of ’07.
Herald: Was Bland a gay person too?

Larry: Yes, he was gay. However, it is my opinion that Donald Young’s murder was made to look like it was done by the same person who had broken in to kill Larry Bland. But there were some problems with it. First, Young’s condo was not broken into. The door was shut, it was not left opened, he was shot multiple times at point blank range in his home in the middle of the night and yet nobody in that entire building heard a single gun shot. His house was not ransacked or robbed. The only things taken were a few personal items and those were all items that could have easily been traced back to whoever had originally given them to him. The apartment wasn’t destroyed, it was ransacked but nothing taken. Come to think of it, he’s on the third or second floor in an apartment building in the middle of the night just before Christmas and nobody hears a single gun shot? It doesn’t make sense.

Herald: You said earlier that you left messages with the Obama campaign and the only person who later called you was Young. Did the campaign ever call you back officially?

Larry: No. The only person whoever contacted me… and this is why I know that Donald Young was telling the truth. Look, every time that I contacted the campaign, I was moving between Laredo, Texas and finally ended up staying in Duluth, Minnesota from August through November of 2007. Every time I had changed my cell phone number, see? I always changed my cell phone number to be a local number to the area where I’m at. Every single time I changed the cell phone number I updated the Obama campaign with the new phone number. And Donald Young continued to contact me on every phone number that was left with the campaign. So there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that he was telling the truth when he said that Barack Obama gave him the phone number and wanted him to fish for information. There is no doubt in my mind about that. I’m convinced about it.

Herald: So tell me, what did Young tell you? What was the conversation?

Donald Young’s Assignment

Larry: Look, the conversation started very guardedly. Over the course of these three months, like I said, from mid or early September to early December, the conversation eventually grew into him opening up and explaining to me. He made it very clear he was given my phone numbers by Barack Obama. He made it very clear he was specifically asked to find out as much as he could, find out about who I had spoken with, who I had given information to and who I had told the story about me and Barack Obama in 1999. There was one phone call in which he had actually told me that Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama were consulting with each other to figure out the best way to come out and clarify his campaign position about the extent of his drug use. So at that time I got a little bit hopeful. I’m like, finally, he’s gonna do the right thing. Then a couple of weeks later, Donald Young is calling me again and he’s telling me not to expect them to ever come clean about it, that all they’re doing is just looking to find out how to deal with me. He makes it clear that Obama is not in any way, shape or form ever going to publicly admit that he was still using drugs in 1999 while he was in the state senate in Illinois.

Herald: And what did Young tell you about his own gay relationship with Obama?

Larry: Young made it clear that there was a relationship. He also made it clear that that relationship entailed both anal sex participation on both parts, both giving and receiving and that’s why I put it in the book.
I put exactly what he had said in the book, as far as how he had contacted me, what he had told me, what he had asked me and the phone numbers that had been last with the campaign.

Herald: So did Young tell you that Obama is gay or bisexual?

Larry: Did he say if Obama was gay? He said that he was involved in a sexual and intimate relationship with Obama for several years. I don’t need him to tell me that Obama is gay. He is telling me that he is sexually involved with Barack Obama. One may take that to mean ok, maybe he’s bisexual because he’s got a wife. Me personally, I’m of the opinion that any man that allows another man to enter any part of their body with their penis, they’re gay, pure and simple. I don’t care how many women they sleep with. Donald Young made it clear to me that Barack Obama was the recipient of anal sex. OK! That right there tells me that no matter what people want to say or question, it tells me that yeah, hes definitely gay.

Herald: For how long has your book been out there now?

Larry: The book was published in June of 2009. So it has been out for about two and a half years. It’s been on Kindle since September of ‘09 and the paperback came out in December 2009.

Herald: Who are your publishers?

Larry: Actually I published it myself.

Herald: If your story is that important, revealing and credible as you want all to believe, why couldn’t you get a single publisher out of the many out there to publish for you?

Larry: I had several potential agreements and two actual agreements with some vanity publishers that were going to get behind the book. But they pulled out after they were being harassed by phone and by e-mail. One of them was Aardvark out of Utah who I had entered into an agreement with. And they flat out provided a letter for the court because Perisi and his law suit tried to say that no publisher would get close to the book and that wasn’t true. There were several publishers that had made verbal agreements that we will go forward with the publication only to be forced to back out. Back in 2008 and 2009, these people on the Internet, they’re merciless. I mean, this publisher out in Utah, they were attacked and subjected to one of the most ridiculous, aggressive,and vulgar phone and email harassments that I have ever seen anybody go through. And they made it very clear that it was the one and only reason they had backed out of our agreement. There were other actual publishing houses that were about to get behind and publish my book but at the last minute pulled out also because of the type of harassment and attacks that were directed at any one that had anything to do with me or the book back in early 2009.

Herald: So you self published the book in 2009 correct?

Larry: Yes. In 2009.

Herald: So when the book came out, Obama was already President. Did you get any form of response from him, or his camp? I mean what reaction did you get from them?

Larry: Well, let me put it to you this way. I had some very close contacts with members of the DC Press Club and the DC media. I know as a fact, that the Obama White House and the Press House had made it clear that any member of the White House Press Corps that mentions my name or questions the administration regarding me or my book would not get an answer and would immediately be escorted off the White House grounds and would be fired. And this is coming from producers and supervisors of those reporters who are members of the White House Press Corps. I have been investigated by Social Security (SS) four different times based on so called confidential fraud reports according to a US Secret Agent out of Jacksonville, who was kind enough to contact SS to kind of play mediator between me and the administration over that.

Herald: What do you mean by play mediator? Why did he have to do that for you? Of what interest was your predicament to him?

Larry: Well, what he was trying to do was calm down a situation because the situation between me and Social Security had gotten down to the point where I just did not want to talk about it anymore. I did not even want to discuss anything with them anymore because like every three weeks I was being called into their offices and I was being told it was the normal review process when in fact it had nothing to do with the normal review. It had to do with constantly being subjected to investigation based on what they claimed were fraud reports done anonymously. Well I know for a fact that Joe Biden’s office contacted SS in June of 2008 and told them to remove my disability payment claiming that I was a fugitive from justice, from parole and probation out of the state of Delaware. And I know this for a fact because the SS office told me exactly where the information came from. You and anyone else in this country know that SS is not an agency that gets a piece of information one day and acts on it the next. It takes them time to do something. They did this in a matter of twenty four hours and the information that Joe Biden’s Senate office gave them claiming that I was a fugitive from Delaware and that I was on parole and probation from that state was a complete lie. I have never been convicted of a crime in the state of Delaware much less ever been on parole or probation. Joe Biden’s son had me arrested and had me to travel between Minnesota and Delaware over a charge that was brought by a Sealed Grand Jury indictment. That was three weeks after I went public against Obama and two weeks after Joe Biden entered his 2008 presidential campaign. They did this only to turn around and have the charges dropped two weeks before I was supposed to go on trial because I had refused to plead guilty to something I didn’t do. Note that had the trial went on, it was going to bring too much negative publicity to the Obama campaign because it was scheduled to start Sept. 11, 2008, just a couple of weeks after the Democratic National Convention was over.

Herald: You were asked during your National Press Club interview whether you intended to write a book about these allegations and you completely rolled out the idea of a book. But you went ahead anyways to publish a book after that. Were you not being disingenuous? What changed your mind?

Arrested By Joe Biden’s Son

Larry: That’s an easy answer to an easy question. When I was asked that question at that time it was not my intent or desire to write a book. But the minute that press conference ended and I walked out of that room into the bar area to the side of the Holman Lounge, the National Press Club (NPC) security supervisor walked in with three plain cloth US Marshals telling me that I was under arrest from a fugitive from justice warrant. The only problem is there was no warrant for fugitive from justice for arrest. When they were asked to produce a warrant, they didn’t have it. But I was still taken into custody and placed down in a DC jail for six days.

Herald: Right from the Press Club interview?

Larry: Yes. I actually left there through a back elevator with three plain cloth United States Marshalls, US Capitol Police, into the garage area of the Press Club into the J.W Marriott. I was put in an SUV and taken to DC District one and placed under custody on an alleged fugitive from justice warrant that was issued not until the very next day. So that’s what changed my mind about writing a book because I spent six days in jail for a warrant that never existed and a charge they never brought. And then I had to spend close to $30,000 in legal fees in a case that was brought against me in the state of Delaware by Joe Biden’s son, Beau Biden, only to have those charges dropped when it became politically inconvenient for the Obama/Biden ticket.

Herald: Living on Social Security how did you come up with close to $30,000 as you just said to defend yourself?

Why I Wrote the Book

Larry: A lot of people donated a lot of money to pay that attorney. So that’s why I wrote the book. You know, the last straw that made me decide to write the book was the fact that during August of 2008, every website that I had during the Democratic National Convention, every single one of them had their servers attacked to the extent the hosting company had to contact me and tell me that they could not even give me access to the accounts to where I could save the files. They said they didn’t want to risk losing the server completely to the other eight thousand customers that they had on those particular servers. Then on October 10, 2008, my AOL, hot mail and blogger accounts, every single one of them was hacked. Every single e-mail and communication between me and Dan Perisi and between me and my attorneys had been deleted. It took me a month and a half before Microsoft even gave me control over my hotmail e-mail account. But that was not until somebody had gone in and deleted everything. And then they set up an automatic vacation response so that anybody who sent an e-mail to me would get a response saying that “I was busy because I had a dick in my mouth, it is hard to type.” These actions that they took, these are actually federal crimes. But nobody gave a damn. OK! The fact that they stole privileged legal and financial information and then started publishing some of those e-mails on various off the wall websites over the next year, nobody had a problem with it happening because it was happening to someone who was accusing Barack Obama. That’s why I wrote the book. Because people really need to see exactly what happened if you stand up and tell the truth, even if it is against somebody who is as popular as Barack Obama. So I don’t regret doing anything that I have done in the last four years. I don’t.

Herald: What was the role of Dan Perisi in the whole saga? How did he end up taking you to court?

Sinclair’s $100,000 Polygraph Challenge

Larry: He contacted me. I didn’t even know who he was. I didn’t even know what Whitehouse.com was. I received an e-mail; I think it was like the 13th to the 16th of February 2008. I had put up a web post that I had contacted Jack Trimarco, who is a famous Polygraph examiner, former FBI polygraph expert. I had contacted him to try to arrange if somehow I could set up a polygraph exam for me. The very day I put up that post, apparently Perisi put up something on Whitehouse .com calling it the $100,000 Polygraph Sinclair challenge. Then he FEDEXed over night, a written proposal that was pretty much identical to what he had published on his website. So that is how he got involved. He contacted me out of the blue. He was looking for some type of publicity. He was looking to promote Whitehouse.com as some type of political website or news website which nobody was taking seriously. People were telling me not to have anything to do with him. But Whitehouse.com was a former porn site and that Perisi was basically an Internet porn merchant. I confronted the issue. But it was a mistake. That’s probably the only thing in the last four years I would change if I had to do it all over again. I would not have gotten involved with Dan Perisi.

Herald: Listening to you at the National Press Club interview, you seemed to have suggested that there is a lot in your criminal and medical background. Considering your own acknowledgement of the questionable life style you have lived over the years, why should anyone believe your story? I mean, you have had mental health issues, and been to jail on fraud charges, not once or twice.

Larry: Well, let me explain something to you. Number one, I think the people who listen to the press conference, if they listen to what I have to say and listen to what I have said before they read all this garbage that was on the Internet by Politico’s Ben Smith, or Daily Kos, nobody ever exposed me or my past. I was very honest about who I was from the very beginning when I went public on Barack Obama. You can look at the Globe article that was published in early February of 2008. You can listen to radio interviews on the Jeff Rense program, on Jim Sumpter’s program, on a local shock jock station out of Minneapolis/ St. Paul and you can also speak with John Crewdson or Jeane MacIntosh of the New York Post and Chicago Tribune. The first words out of my mouth have always been look, I have a pass. I’m not squeaky clean. I have never denied it.
But the problem is that people have exaggerated my criminal history. For example, Ben Smith of Politico on the day of the Press Club claimed that I have a twenty seven year history. Well that’s just blatantly false. I do not have a twenty seven year criminal history. I have a criminal history from 1980 to 1986. Six years and that is it. My criminal history is because I used to write checks that belonged to me on accounts that didn’t have any money in them in 1980. Alright? And then I was used to getting pierced up by youth counselors so I took some of their checks and signed their names to them and I admitted to doing that. Ben Smith says that I was charged with minor things in 1986 and only convicted in 1987 of more severe charges. That’s not true.

In November 1986, I was arrested and charged with one unauthorized use of a financial transaction device and two second degree forgeries. OK? Those were the same charges that I pled guilty to in February 1987 in front of Judge Shannon in the Jefferson County District Court, in Jefferson County, Colorado. Those are the same two charges that I not only pled guilty to, but I stood in front of Judge Shannon the day I pled guilty and told him I didn’t need an attorney, I didn’t need to waste the state’s money, I’m guilty. Then I questioned the judge and said look, the second degree forgery, I don’t know what I’m accused of forging because the only thing I signed at the hotel was my own name. That’s it, ok. So Ben Smith and Politico kind of forged a little bit of the information. It wasn’t necessarily true. Then he went on to say that I am a wanted fugitive from Colorado.
True, there is an outstanding criminal warrant out of Pablo County, Colorado. And in 2008, I was dealing with the District Attorney who was assigned that case and I specifically told that District Attorney that I would be more than happy to return to Colorado. I was told, quote unquote, “Do not do that. I do not want you to go through the expense of coming out here because I’m not even prepared to proceed with the case. I’m most likely going to dismiss it.” And that came from chief deputy District Attorney Jim Coursey. So people saying that I’m avoiding prosecution of something in Colorado are just simply not true. I have offered repeatedly to go take care of it and have been told repeatedly not to waste the money and go out there for something that they are going to dismiss.

Herald: So where do you live now?

Larry: I live in Port Orange, Florida.

Herald: What has been the reaction from the public since your book was published?

Larry: In the last year, in all honesty the book is picking up steam.

Herald: How come not even FOXNEWS has reviewed your book?

Larry: Let me tell you a couple of things. You really have to dig very hard to find this on the Internet these days. In 2008, the number one prime time television on the Island of Puerto Rico, it’s called Super Exclusivo, it’s on WAPA TV. They actually had a live sound interview with me in April of 2008. When they did it, the minute it went off the air, Daily Kos, Democratic Underground and the Obama campaign started bombarding the program and the television network with faxes, e-mails and phone calls, cursing them out and demanding that they go back on air and call me every name in the book. They put so much pressure on this TV show that the very next day the Obama campaign Puerto Rican manager, an attorney by the name of Andres Lopez, went on the program the very next day by phone and told the host of the program that I had been a pain in the campaign’s back for more than a year. This guy represented the Obama campaign and he’s the first and only one we know of that actually went on a radio or television program and specifically made claims about me. Andre Lopez went on this program and called me the pain on the campaign’s back and also claimed that I am a mental case. I mean, this is coming from somebody who’s supposed to know what they’re talking about. This was the attitude that was taken against any media that ever tried to interview me in 2008. It’s not like they didn’t. I have been on Spanish radio in Miami, Univision radio, did the television interview out of Puerto Rico. I have done many interviews. The problem is the Obama campaign retaliated against every one of these outlets almost immediately by using Daily Kos and Democratic Underground. On October 3 of 2008, Obama did a campaign appearance in Grand Rapid Michigan. I was there and less than a hundred feet from him. I had a mega phone and I kept asking him from the megaphone if he would bother to tell people where he was at on November 6 and 7, 1999. The people at that campaign rally were ready to kill me.

Herald: Were you arrested?

Larry: No. I was not arrested because I didn’t break the law. But see, this is what happened. There was a reporter out of the largest radio station in Grand Rapid Michigan. And I’m talking about the largest urban music station. He was there when I had interrupted Obama’s speech and they ended up putting me on live on the radio for more than an hour. The campaign was furious. They were on the line, the other lines with the directors and the producers of the radio station demanding that they take me off which they did not do. And then they turned around and told the radio station they will never give them access to anything to do with the Obama campaign because they had me on the air. So that was the biggest reason people were not reporting it. The campaign was very well organized at taking any media outlet and trying to make them look like they were complete mental cases if they as much as mentioned my name. I guess Rush Limbaugh said it best this last Monday or Tuesday. There was a black lady that called in and wanted to show the double standard with the Herman Cain allegations and the Obama allegations. She had asked Limbaugh whether he thinks the press is going to start talking about Obama and Larry Sinclair now that they are talking about claims about Newt Gingrich from the 1970s. Rush turned around and said,”No. They will continue to portray him as some nut case, some right wing nut.”

Herald: Are you actually conservative or liberal?

Larry: The funny thing is all my life I have always been more to the democratic side of politics. I mean, socially speaking, I don’t actually believe in gay marriage. And I don’t also think that just because someone doesn’t condone homosexuality, I don’t believe they are necessarily homophobes. I think people have the right to turn around and say that they don’t agree with a particular life style. But that doesn’t make them intolerant.

Herald: You’re openly gay and you don’t believe in gay marriage?

Larry: No. I don’t.

Herald: But you’re gay!

Larry: No! Let me explain why. Marriage has always been a cultural thing. It has never been a legal or legislative thing. Marriage has always been based on the individual culture of the people. And marriage has always been culturally between a man and a woman. It has always been a cultural and religious thing. It has never been a legal and legislative thing. So to me, I don’t think any legislation whether federal or state should define what marriage is or is not. On the same token, I don’t think they should say that gay marriage is ok. Who are we as politicians and legislators to try to change the culture of the people?

Herald: Do you have a partner?

Larry: No. Right now, no.

Herald: Did you ever have one?

Larry: Oh yeah. I had one for almost fifteen years.

Herald: So what did you call him? Wife? Partner? What?

Larry: But that’s just it. You didn’t have to call them anything. If you’re living together, you’re living together. Your sleeping together, you sleep together. You see, the problem is everybody wants to put a label on something. Let me ask you this, do you think it is ok for the gay community to go and stop people from conducting businesses?

Herald: How is your relationship to the Gay community? Have you come under any pressure from them since you started pushing these allegations against Obama?

Larry: As for the organized political side of the Gay community, I have no relationship with them at all. The political activists in the gay community have attacked me personally as well as those related to me from the first public statement I made about Barack Obama. Some of the more conservative gay community ones have however started to question Obama’s past and have at least been open to the idea of Obama responding to my allegations one way or the other.

Herald: You said you saw the nakedness of Barack Obama. If his wife were to read this interview, would you mind giving a description of his manhood to convince her that you truly saw it, that you’re not just making up these allegations?

Larry: Michelle Obama was mailed (in a registered letter) a description of Barack Obama’s “manhood” in January 2009 before the book was even published and it is also in the last chapter of the book. Michelle Obama knows already these allegations are truthful and has engaged in activities using her position as First Lady to do everything possible to keep them from being reported openly and honestly.
Herald: Larry, what do you plan on accomplishing right now? I mean these allegations have been out there for about six years. What do you want to see happen?

Larry: Some four years after having first made my allegations against Barack Obama, I believe it is imperative that he respond personally and publicly to them. I believe that as the 2012 election cycle begins to hit full speed it is necessary for the American people to be provided with an open and honest response from the sitting President as to

1. Did Barack Obama use crack cocaine in 1999 while a sitting Illinois State Senator
2. Did Barack Obama engage in extramarital relations with Larry Sinclair, Donald young and/or any other men?
3. Was Donald Young Barack Obama’s male lover in Chicago Illinois as claimed by the now murdered Young?
4. Did Barack or Michelle Obama have or know anyone who had anything to do with the Murder of Donald Young just days before the 2008 Iowa Caucus?

These are valid and fair questions for any potential presidential candidate who has been publicly accused of these things. Even more so for a sitting president who has repeatedly made the statements “No one is above the law,” and “I am the most transparent President in American history.” Four years later I want to see the questions asked of Barack Obama face to face and I want him to answer them publicly and without a teleprompter.

http://www.newhampshireherald.com/page19.html
http://www.newhampshireherald.com/page20.html
http://www.newhampshireherald.com/page21.html
http://www.newhampshireherald.com/page22.html
http://www.newhampshireherald.com/index.html