Of course, he was murdered a few months after this video…
jews/israel is behind the false flag attacks in France in order to drum up fake anger towards Muslims that are moving into France
Every single issue VICE covers is black ops for CIA to gain access to intel.
Boycott any barcode that starts with 871 or 729, those items with 871 or 729 benefits Israel, Avoid!
Photo of the 2 babies US born and israeli jew soldier Max Steinberg shot in Gaza before being killed
Rest in Peace little boy.
A lot of servers are based in Israel, from Facebook to news sites, video sites like YouTube. etc.
All leads back to the zionist jews who have always been watching you. Even the presidential candidates have to suck dick to Israel at every election, they know who controls the USA.
First it was England in control of the USA, now it’s Israel. Don’t be fooled, it’s Israel who controls the USA.
They put jews in all position of power to keep control. Notice all the lawmakers against Snowden are jews with allegiance to Israel first and foremost, they are religious nuts.
Another jewish hollywood foreshadowing movie. Made in 2008. Pertains to the boston bombings done by Israeli goons pinning it on 2 teenage patsies.
Must suck to have that nose when it’s always sniffing assholes.
Call Bob Wieckowski and tell him Stop Selling Us Out to the Red Light Camera Companies
Ask for Ashley Medina, his Legislative Aid or just leave a message.
If the line is busy, keep calling till you get through
Bob took $2,000 from Redflex camera to sponsor the bill. The bill seeks to take away your rights in court.
Bob and his partner, Fremont school teacher Sue Lemke, and her sons, Evan and Luke, enjoy traveling, gardening, biking, sports, hiking and stealing money from non jews.
Notice the scumbag is using his yahoo email address for government business.
Bob Wieckowski for State Assembly
39510 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite #220
Fremont, CA 94538
Phone: (510) 790-2732
Fax: (510) 744-4263
Wieckowski, Bob Democrat
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4016, Sacramento, CA 94249-0025; (916) 319-2025
39510 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 280, Fremont, CA 94538; (510) 440-9030
Cancer is caused by everything around us, from McDonalds to laundry detergent. Cancer research for over 25 years plus is a major money making scam.
Just like Food Banks.
Stop donating to cancer research and to food banks. No one is fucking hungry in America with the food stamps that are out there.
John Bills took the zionist jewish company Redflex up his ass, where are the criminal charges on all these people?
Largest Red Light Camera Program In World Faces Widened Corruption Probe
Redflex loses red light camera contract in Chicago, Illinois following investigation into corruption.
The Australian Securities Exchange allowed trading to resume on Redflex stock this morning. On Thursday, the photo enforcement firm had requested a trading halt to prevent a massive sell-off as news leaked of a widening corruption probe in Chicago, Illinois. The Chicago Tribune’s report that a city official apparently took bribes from the company in the form of luxury trips and sporting tickets was confirmed by an official investigation. On Friday, Redflex received notice from the city that it will “not be considered a responsible bidder” for the red light camera contract that comes up for renewal on July 31. That means the firm will lose 384 cameras, the single largest red light camera contract in the world.
The news hit Redflex hard. In 2012, the company reported a net profit before tax of $21.3 million. It announced Monday the figure through December will drop to $5.5 million or possibly less as legal costs mount. As the firm paid $6.2 million in tax last year, that means the firm could post a loss for the year. Redflex fortunes have depended heavily on the Windy City, which generated 13 percent of the firm’s revenue and represented 19 percent of its installed camera base. The contract value totaled $84 million and was set to generate even more cash on the way to 440 installed cameras in upcoming years. Because Chicago takes ownership of the cameras upon contract termination, Redflex will also lose a significant investment in equipment, which was $11.3 million as of 2010.
Upon the market’s opening Monday, shares plunged 24 percent from $1.55 to $1.28. Shareholders have been upset since last November, when they issued a first strike against the company’s lavish executive compensation package. On Wednesday, Max Findlay, the chairman of the board and Ian Davis, a director, were forced to resign in light of their reported role in the unfolding Chicago incident.
So far, Redflex admits it paid for luxury accommodations for John Bills, the Chicago official in charge of the red light camera contract, in violation of city ethics rules. This is nothing out of the ordinary for the industry. In 2010, the Australian firm also put the police chief of Oak Ridge, Tennessee up at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in return for his favorable testimony at a court trial two years ago. Affiliated Computer Services (ACS, now a part of Xerox) was caught giving hockey tickets and other services to police officers in Edmonton, Canada, although criminal charges were ultimately dropped. American Traffic Solutions (ATS) regularly entertains public officials involved in red light camera business, but the airfare, lodging and wages during the event is paid for by taxpayers, not ATS.
According to court records, the Edmonton police officer who recommended ACS for a no-bid photo ticketing contract had an affair with an ACS employee. The officer’s ex-wife testified the cop had been so cooperative with ACS because he expected to land a lucrative job with ACS upon retirement. The hiring of former municipal officials who have helped companies land lucrative deals has become so routine that municipal officials expect it to happen. This was the case with a traffic sergeant in Lynnwood, Washington who went as far as to use his official position to advertise on behalf of ATS. The former mayor of St. Peters, Missouri spent a year in jail after he solicited a bribe from Redflex on a deal that was not worth much money to the company.
Mitt Romney lost to John McCain, John McCain lost to Obama by a landslide, what made you idiots think he was going to beat Obama
GOP and the Democrats are 1 party, controlled by the jews so they can control the financial markets and war for Israel.
Ron Paul or Gary Johnson was your real chance to change the system.
Radio host Mark Levin is a zionist jew, an Israel firster piece of shit, boycott his books and his radio shows
Guy has become a joke now, with his Ron Paul hatred. All because this POS wants Israel to be taken care of above America.
Fuck off Mark Levin and your dead dog, 7UP or whatever stupid name you gave it.
Josh Mayeux, network defender, works at the Air Force Space Command Network Operations & Security Center at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colorado July 20, 2010.
A privacy watchdog has uncovered a government memo that encourages federal agents to befriend people on a variety of social networks, to take advantage of their readiness to share — and to spy on them. In response to a Freedom of Information request, the government released a handful of documents, including a May 2008 memo detailing how social-networking sites are exploited by the Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS).
As of Thursday morning, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and Digg had not commented on the report, which details the official government program to spy via social networking. Other websites the government is spying on include Twitter, MySpace, Craigslist and Wikipedia, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which filed the FOIA request.
“Narcissistic tendencies in many people fuel a need to have a large group of ‘friends’ link to their pages, and many of these people accept cyber-friends that they don’t even know,” stated one of the documents obtained by the EFF. “This provides an excellent vantage point for FDNS to observe the daily life of beneficiaries and petitioners who are suspected of fraudulent activities,” it said.
According to the EFF, this memo — which specifically details how the government evaluates potential citizen requests — suggests there’s nothing to prevent an exaggerated, harmless or even out-of-date offhand comment in a status update from quickly becoming the subject of a full investigation.
With this revelation, the government joins a growing list of groups using social-networking sites for purposes other than social networking. As these sites have gained popularity, scammers and spammers have become rampant, and hackers are increasingly turning to networks such as Facebook to spread viruses and Trojan Horses.
The EFF also uncovered efforts by the Department of Homeland Security to monitor social media during the inauguration of President Obama. According to the documents, the DHS collected a massive amount of data on individuals and organizations explicitly tied to the event.
The DHS notably attempted to ensure that its use of social networks was appropriate while gathering data online. The newly released documents cite the Fair Information Practices Principles, a 2008 policy memo by the Department of Homeland Security’s chief privacy officer that set guidelines for ensuring online privacy during the collection of information.
Another government agency, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, denies using social networks to spy on people.
“USCIS does not permit agency personnel to attempt to ‘friend’ immigration petitioners and their beneficiaries on social networks in an effort to reveal fraud.”
Still, the EFF worries that the DHS may be taking things too far. “While it is laudable to see DHS discussing the Fair Information Practice Principles as part of the design for such a project, the breadth of sites targeted is concerning,” the watchdog group wrote on its website.
Among the networks specifically cited for analysis “were general social networking sites like Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and Flickr, as well as sites that focus specifically on certain demographic groups such as MiGente and BlackPlanet, news sites such as NPR, and political commentary sites DailyKos,” the EFF wrote.
For more information, read the full report at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
FoxNews.com’s SciTech section is on Twitter! Follow us @fxnscitech.
I can’t tell you what you’re missing and I doubt many here have much experience of an orthodox school, but I can tell you what is often missing from a typical Israeli-led narrative.
That is: the idea that Palestine was ‘up for grabs’. This view is expressed in several ways:
- It was unsettled (the land without people for the people without land)
- It mostly wasn’t private land, so was ‘free’
- It was British land to ‘give away.’
- Recent immigrants immediately acquire rights to self determination
- Palestinians, not Jews, were the recent immigrants.
- Jews, not Palestinians, are the ‘true’ owners
- It remained, some 2,000 years after the Romans conquered it, inherently ‘Jewish’ land
Put simply, local Arabs, and a small number of Jews mostly rubbed along until progroms in Eastern Europe and the idea of creating a Jewish state in Palestine started to bring far larger number of Jewish immigrants to Palestine.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 changed that. Even after these initial waves of immigration, Jews accounted for less than 10% of the population of Palestine in 1919. Within the next 20 years, five times that 1919 number (58,000) had emigrated to Palestine. At the same time Jews in Europe and Palestine were seeking to build a state in Palestine, Palestinian Arabs were also seeking self-determination.
I’m not going to take you through the various arguments above, except to say that they are contradicted either by facts (notably around immigration) or the prevailing trend in which (African, mainly) countries have unpicked longstanding colonial fictions of empty land and pre-nation state territories being ‘terra nullius.’
So Palestinians existed. They lived in the land and had lived there in great numbers for centuries. They had a right to self-determination, as had been granted to Arabs everywhere else in the Middle East. They sought self-determination at the exact same time Jews were lobbying for a state in Palestine and long before modern Jews lived in Palestine as anything but a distinct minority.
After that was various failed partition plans. Notably in 1937, rejected by both sides and the later UN Partition Plan, rejected by the Arab side but accepted by the Jewish side. By this point, 1937, Palestine was effectively in civil war.
It is, from a Palestinian perspective, a grave injustice that land their people had farmed, owned, lived in and used for centuries could be promised away to what were overwhelmingly new immigrants citing ancient patrimony as good reason to partition Palestine. It is also gravely unfair that crimes committed by others – notably the pogroms and the holocaust, should be paid for by Palestinians.
Who started it?
Palestinians massacred Jews at Hebron in 1929, the first atrocity of this sorry conflict. They revolted, violently, against what they saw as uncontrolled Jewish immigration between 1936 and 1939. In his bid to further Palestinian nationalism, Haj Amin al-Husseini sought support from Hitler. They – here meaning Palestinians and Arabs from surrounding countries – attacked the one day old Israel in 1948 when the British Mandate ended.
These things all happened, and there is no question that they mark moral, diplomatic and military failures among the Palestinians.
Does this mean they started it?
The Jews that emigrated to Palestine were not passive arrivals. They made it very clear they intended to carve out a land in Palestine. Initially, the aim was all of Transjordan and Palestine, then by 1917, Zionist organisations were seeking just the land west of the Jordan. They also boycotted Arab labor and engaged in discriminatory practices. This was not a peaceful immigration. The Zionists of 1917 were political radicals who were not seeking coexistence. They were seeking a Jewish state.
It is in this context that the 1929 massacre at Hebron happened, which was fueled by nationalist tension on both sides, including marches on the Western Wall by Jews declaring Jerusalem to be theirs, violence, and rumors that Jews planned to attack Al Aqsa. I’m not excusing the massacre. I am, however, pointing out that it did not occur simply because Arabs hate Jews, or Arabs can’t coexist.
In 1936-9 hundreds of Arabs died in the Arab Revolt, a last ditch attempt to stop the British allowing ever greater numbers of state-seeking Jews into Palestine, and to stop a formal partition plan.
And by 1947 there is considerable violence on both sides. In fact, more violence, and more violence against Arab civilians, from Jewish paramilitaries and terrorists than the reverse. This part is often left out of Israel’s creation myth: how dirty that early phase of the war was fought. Bombs were exploded in several Arab markets, for example. The men that did it went onto be lauded as war heroes. Bear that in mind the next time someone tells you that Arabs fete their terrorists.
In 1948, better organized and better armed Jewish factions prevailed. One major creation myth is that Palestinians were told to leave by Arab forces. They weren’t, and the new Israeli historians have done some work to show how cynically non-Jewish populations were forced from their homes through ethnic cleansing, massacre and propaganda. Israel’s own military archives from the time were opened to historians but yielded some very damaging insights into the 1948 war. They are now closed once more.
In other words, place yourself in the position of an average Palestinian of the era: a group of people rock up, declare they intend to thwart your plans to finally have self-determination and that they have people in another continent backing them to build their own state where you live. They boycott your labor and your produce. Then, when all is said and done, they tell you that you started it because you couldn’t live in peace. And the more hardline ones insist you are the occupiers because of the Muslim Conquest in the 7th century (an event which liberated Palestine from the Byzantine Empire and which actually allowed Jews back into Jerusalem again.)
In modern times, similar themes emerge. I.e. that Israel is a reluctant participant in violence, that its actions are reactions and the root of the issue is Palestinian intransigence or Jew-hatred, and that Palestinians are child-sacrificers, a particularly ugly blood libel more typically used to excuse away hundreds of civilian deaths in Gaza. A whole industry has emerged to construct an alternate world in which Arabs simply couldn’t accept Jews – the underlying premise of which is that Palestinians from Palestine should have moved to Jordan, or Egypt, or Lebanon – and that their ‘greed’ is the architect of their sorry situation, that their situation isn’t too bad, that they don’t know when to give up.
I don’t intend to defend Palestinian terrorism except to say that:
- It didn’t emerge in a vacuum. No terrorism does.
- Terrorism is a loaded term and unhelpful term insofar as it divides different groups using violence into neat ‘black’ and ‘white’ categories.
On this second point: Palestinian action is always terrorism, even where conducted against active combat soldiers in conflict areas. ‘Moral’ defensive actions against Palestinians by either Israeli security forces or Israeli civilians (typically settlers) are never terrorism. We now have a large corpus of casualty data, witness testimony and investigative reports by human rights organisations and rapporteurs to dismiss the idea of one side being moral, one side only using terror, one side only targeting civilians, either through intent or negligence. It simply begs disbelief that so many organisations within and outside Israel have found such similar narratives in how poorly Palestinians have been treated under occupation and that they are wrong or biased.
Settlements, justice and two states
In modern times, the major issue is settlements, which are a modern invention – they appeared after the 1967 war. Settlements in the West Bank confirm long held Palestinian suspicions that Israel ultimately wants all – or nearly all- land west of the Jordan. They show an utter disregard for international law. Their continued growth directly impacts the viability of a two state solution.
And yet, one still finds people who insist that they are not an issue.
Furthermore, the settlements that house Jewish extremists, notably around Hebron, are little more than state-sanctioned terrorism. These settlers are rarely punished for acts of violence, property damage, theft or terror – the last survey found fewer than 5% of Palestinian complaints resulted in convictions. By contrast, 99% of Palestinians charged with crimes in the West Bank are convicted, and often treated very poorly by the Israeli justice system.
We often hear about how Gaza or Hamas is the issue – a topic in its own right. But if you want to look at where a typical Israeli narrative is blind to what is being done to Palestinians – people who aren’t launching rockets and aren’t the hardline Islamists of Gaza and who very clearly are actively cooperating with Israel, then Jerusalem and the West Bank is the place. What is hidden is how much damage is being done to long term peace, by Israelis.
The big points of difference are:
- Immigration, ownership and statehood
- Whitewashing the Nakba and the events leading up to it
- Occupation denial and the impact of settlements
I could go into Gaza – a place where Israelis once went for tea and where you could get a beer, but it’s a long topic and I’ve had to skim a lot already. Suffice to say, extreme conditions breed extremism. One striking thing you notice is how such immense and protracted violence against civilians is met with a wall of indifference, denial and victim-blaming. It is probably the clearest indication of where non-Israeli views of the ‘facts’ diverge so sharply from that of neutrals or pro-Palestinians.