Update: Case of Berg vs. Obama

Case of Berg vs. Obama, U.S.S.C. Case No. 08-570, in the U.S. Supreme Court has been scheduled for two [2] Conferences [January 9th and 16th, 2009].
The Justices of the Supreme Court will read letters sent to them. Let them know how important it is for them to hear our case; how “standing” is important on the issue of Obama’s qualifications; how we are headed for a “Constitutional crisis” if Obama’s qualifications are not resolved; how important it is to follow “our Constitution;” and how Obama’s records: his original ‘vault’ birth certificate, immigration records when he as Barry Soetoro [adopted in Indonesia] returned to Hawaii in 1971, if any, and any change of name Court records are necessary as Obama might be an illegal alien, not only not qualified to be President, but a fraud as U.S. Senator from Illinois.
Write one [1] letter to the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court (names are listed below), make nine [9] copies and put them in nine [9] separate envelopes, addressed to each Justice, and then place them into one [1] manila envelope and mail to:

U.S. Supreme Court
1 First Street, N.E
Washington, D.C. 20543
Supreme Court Justices
Chief Justice John Roberts
Associate Justices:

Samuel A. Alito
Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Stephen G. Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Note: Any communications received by the U.S. Supreme Court via e-mail or fax are thrown away. The U.S. Supreme Court will not take telephone messages for the Justices. All communications to the U.S. Supreme Court must be done in writing and sent to them by way of U.S. mail, UPS, Federal Express, etc.

UPDATE: 1/12/09

PRESS RELEASE – U.S. Supreme Court denies Berg vs. Obama Berg states he is disappointed for the 300+ million U.S. citizens, for our “Forefathers” and for the tens of thousands that have died defending “our” Constitution and we will fight on as Obama is “not qualified” to be President

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/12/09) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, in the U.S. Supreme Court announced today that the U.S. Supreme Court has “denied” our Petition For Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment.

Berg said, “I am disappointed for the 300+ million U.S. citizens, our ‘Forefathers’ and for the tens of thousands that have died defending ‘our’ Constitution.

I am committed to keep our efforts going to continue litigation until the truth of Obama being ‘not qualified’ for President comes out.  The Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘HOAX’ ever to be put forth to the citizens of the United States in 230 years.

In addition to the current case in the U.S. Supreme Court, we have or will have:

A case filed two [2] months ago captioned Berg vs. Obama, said case ‘under seal’ so I cannot comment further;

The case of Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama, filed 12/31/08 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 08-02254; said case being an ‘Interpleader’ case with the Plaintiff, a retired Colonel from the U.S. Air Force, who is questioning whether to obey or disobey an order if Obama recalls him, based upon whether or not Obama is a ‘qualified’ President;

The case that was denied in the U.S. Supreme Court is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Berg vs. Obama, with our Brief due by January 20, 2009; and

If Obama is sworn in as President, we will file a Petition for Writ of ‘Quo Warranto,’ a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as President because he is ‘not qualified.’

Berg states ‘if Obama is sworn in’ because Obama knows he is ‘not qualified’ and he should hold a Press Conference and Obama should state that I, as a black American, received more votes than anyone else on November 4, 2008 for President and on January 8, 2009 the Joint Session of Congress counted the Electoral College votes and announced that I am President-elect, but because of things in my background, I cannot be sworn in as President.  However, Obama is not man enough to state the above!

More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the ‘qualifications’ for President.  When the truth finally comes out, individuals including Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Howard Dean [Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)], other top officials of the DNC, senior campaign staff and some of his new administration should be brought into the criminal justice system, indicted and tried with incarceration for those convicted.”

Berg continued, “Obama is setting himself up to be blackmailed and perhaps he is already being blackmailed.  He was the candidate for ‘change,’ but look at his cabinet – 70% from President Clinton’s days and how about his Secretary of Defense, Gates.  Give me a break!

There is nothing more important than ‘our’ U.S. Constitution and we will fight on!”

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL  [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005



Filed under Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, Bill Clinton, Corruption, David Axelrod, DNC, Donald Young, Elections, Frank Marshall Davis, George Bush, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Images, Jimmy Carter, Joe Biden, John Edwards, John Kerry, John McCain, Karl Rove, Larry Sinclair, Mainstream Media, Michelle Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Obambi.com, Other, Pastor Manning, Ralph Nader, Rev. Wright, Richard Daley, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Sean Hannnity, Sexism, Tony Rezko, YouTube Videos

18 responses to “Update: Case of Berg vs. Obama

  1. Frosteetoes

    God speed Mr. Berg. I am so glad he has been high profile on these blogs because I think it insures his safety while he speaks on behalf of American patriotism. Had we not heard about this and other cases these fine citizens would have gone the way of Donald Young. As inept as Obama is and will be, he is involved with corruption yet to be revealed that includes dangerous elements. I hope Blago sings like a bird when they impeach him. I hope he has hired himself some loyal bodyguards as well.

  2. Ted

    Obama can’t be POTUS.

    Since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress, rendering moot both the Berg and Lightfoot cases, Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.

    Checkmate! (WHERE IS THE NEWS MEDIA?)

  3. suzyQ

    It is becoming apparently clear that the corruption and blackmail and coverups in Washington run very deep. The Bush’s, Clinton’s and Mr. Obama have all sold out. They have so much dirt on each other that none of them can stand up for our Country. This all goes way back to Obama’s Mom at the Ford Foundation and money laundering, micro loans, Africa’s oil , Marc Rich, and the Unocal pipeline. There is no stopping this bus unless they are all brought down. They have the power and the appointee’s including corrupt Rahm (money laundering King) working to build their empires as they destruct America. It is a sad day in America. The ignorant in America have continued election after election to put these elitist in Office and we have paid the price for it. In the end our freedom and great Country will be sacrificed. The supreme court is just a voice for the President. There is no justice or honor involved.

  4. The Government Socked It To Us!

    Here is the painful reality. Fitzgerald has been investigating Obama along with Blagojovitch from many long past months. Fitzgerald already knows Obama has already committed enough crimes to be arrested, stand trial, found guilty and sit in jail above and beyond failing to meet Consitutional requirements Section II part I. So does the American public, Obama”s key campaign advisors, the Clintons, Pelosi, and the entire gang of lawless conspirators who are responsible for installing a usurper into the Whitehouse. Obama’s many felony crimes are all so well known by so many, there is no doubt that Fitzgerald was ordered to keep his hands off Obama. In exchange for looking the other way, Fitzgerald was given Blagojevitch as one gives a dog a bone. Obama is simply above the law and untouchable.

    There is no doubt in my mind after I heard Congress approve of Obama as President yesterday, that the best the Supreme Court will do is give time and attention to the Obama law suits, then find a convoluted way to claim Obama does meet the Constituional Requirements to be President in hopes of quashing this issue once and for all. America, its wonderful Constitution, and the will of the people be damned. WE now live in a lawless America.

    Another words our government socked it to us.
    All that remains is to continue beating a dead horse until either we are totally defeated by a government turned dictatorship or we have a revolution.

    A government by the people, for the people is only fantasy and an old memory. “We the People” are now victims of tyranny oppression.

    Please join the discussion on http://www.blogtalkradio.com/vos Sunday 1/11/09 between 7 & 9 p.m. pacific standard time. Call in at 347-633-9851. There will be so little time left before the Obama regime starts shutting all voices that oppose him. Let us speak out while we still can! http://usapatriots-shout.blogspot.com

  5. takebackAmericaNOW

    —well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!

  6. takebackAmericaNOW

    Michelle Obama has something to boast about…I BET SHE LOST HER LAW LICENSE FASTER THAN ANY ATTORNEY IN US HISTORY (only 3 years).


    The bots are trying to say she voluntarily gave it up, but she was DISCIPLINED by rule 770. Voluntary relinquishment is Rule 756, unlike hers which was “court ordered”


    Rule number 770..it is all about types of Discipine…and reasons for a lawyer to be disbarred

    See, Rule 756 is about voluntary inactive status, which simply costs $105/year, no biggie. That’s what you’d do if you were a lawyer wanting to go inactive, voluntarily without any extraneous forces.

    But Rule 770 is all about DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS. An attorney may be on “voluntary inactive status persuant to Rule 770” but that is not the same as Rule 756, which is invoked purely on personal whim. Michelle’s ARDC report states: “No malpractice report required, as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.”

    Court ordered means court ordered, not Michelle ordered.
    If Michelle had ordered it, that would be via Rule 756. Michelle Obama is on “Court Ordered Inactive Status” pursuant to Rule 770, i.e. disciplinary rules, to avoid reporting of malpractice. Compelled to go voluntarily inactive would be the kindest description of this outcome.

    If she’d have wanted to go VOLUNTARY INACTIVE she’d have used Rule 756:

    “(5) An attorney may advise the Administrator in writing that he or she desires to assume inactive status and, thereafter, register as an inactive status attorney. The annual registration fee for an inactive status attorney shall be $105. Upon such registration, the attorney shall be placed upon inactive status and shall no longer be eligible to practice law or hold himself or herself out as being authorized to practice law in this State, except as is provided in paragraph (j) of this rule. An attorney who is on the master roll as an inactive status attorney may advise the Administrator in writing that he or she desires to resume the practice of law, and thereafter register as active upon payment of the registration fee required under this rule and submission of verification from the Director of MCLE that he or she has complied with MCLE requirements as set forth in Rule 790 et seq. If the attorney returns from inactive status after having paid the inactive status fee for the year, the attorney shall pay the difference between the inactive status registration fee and the registration fee required under paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this rule. Inactive status under this rule does not include inactive disability status as described in Rules 757 and 758. Any lawyer on inactive disability status is not required to pay an annual fee.”

    Michelle Obama is the “specifically named individual” on page 64 of the FBI Affidavit. Blagojevich bemoans that whereas Michelle got fat board positions earning six figures part time, for which she was eminently unqualified…that Mrs. Blagojevich at least was qualified. THIS is how these corrupt thieves do “pay to play” in Chicago, award board slots, award stock options (Michelle sat on UCI Hospital @$312K after 0bama made a $1Million earmark to the hospital, also Walmart’s Treehouse when she knew nothing about distribution, and got Walmart Treehouse stock options) to WIVES. Blago’s wife also closed on the Obama Rezko mansion deal.

    The dirty Obamas have so much garbage and corruption between them they could fill a landfill.

    Their criminality makes Nixon’s look like a PARKING VIOLATION in comparison!

  7. takebackAmericaNOW

    from theobamafile.com

    One Lawyer’s Opinion

    The SCOTUS disposition of Berg v. Obama: “The motion of Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.” You may read by link a report and a commentary about this by blogger, law student, and close follower of this case, Jeff Schreiber. The commentary presents considered opinions, but not the only rational opinions.

    I was reading the first couple of pages and one thing written in the amicus brief should show you that the issues are REAL and people should not get discouraged. On page 2 and 3 are the telling paragraphs

    1. This Court is not facing a question of the constitutional aspects of standing, but a question pertaining to the prudential considerations only; and

    2. The lack of an adequate remedy following the inauguration of Barack Obama, and the potential civil and military crises which could arise therefrom, that could not be readily addressed by the ordinary processes of the law, must be considered in addressing the prudential aspects of standing; and,

    3. With respect to the prudential considerations of standing, certain aspects of this case are analogous to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

    Okay, looking at these 3 provisions, the Supreme Court granted the brief and denied the stay because there is a bigger problem. This issue (e.g. granting writ of certiorari in Berg v. Obama) will not only affect Obama, but it will likely impact Biden (Vice President Elect) as well since he was involved and current Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi) and any other person who is the successor in line to be President because they have knowledge of the fraud and complied with it (e.g. current democratic leadership). The people supporting Obama know the U.S. has a problem and that is why coup de’tat are so effective, but what is critical is that THE MILITARY KNOWS AND ARE ON GUARD NOT TO FOLLOW ANY ORDERS FROM AN INELIGIBLE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.

    That is why the Supreme Court is being extra cautious here in which they should because there is a possibility of another American civil war. The investigations on all levels are going to impact a whole bunch of people who will need to be removed from serving in a federal capacity. This will likely be an Al Capone feat in bringing this down once all of this goes through.

    FYI, res ipsa loquitur means “the thing speaks for itself.” It is a term used in tort law and an example of it is chairs don’t fly out of 5 story buildings by themselves, they have to be thrown out by a person or natural act (e.g. hurricane, storm).

    In terms of standing, Bill Anderson believes that Berg has standing to deal with the matter at hand.

    Go ahead and publish my views if you like, and it is just an opinion from a lawyer in Missouri and federal courts.

  8. Supremes deny Berg, but questions about Obama’s birth record persist
    The Supreme court denied Philip Berg certiorari today, but questions about Obama’s birth record persist. He has never provided his long form birth certificate even after several lawsuits. Instead, he has fought in court to keep it a secret document. On January 20th Barack Obama will enter the White House under a cloud of suspicion about his status as a natural born citizen. This is a shame. All he had to do was shoe the document. This is a slap in the face of every American who cherishes the Constitution.

  9. Catherine

    I think this blog and the people who post on it are pretty nuts. The court’s should sanction your frivolous petitions. grow up and get over the election. If you want to be real patriots, embrace your new president or go back to putting tin foil under your hats so the noise from Martians won’t be soooooo loud.

  10. Frosteetoes

    Catherine, obsessed with Sarah Palin too much?

  11. Oh Catherine

    Typical white women hating on other women because she hates herself.

    I would too if I looked like you.

    18 friends Catherine, c’mon there are more Obamabots than that.

  12. takebackAmericaNOW

    OMG Obambi THAT is scary!!
    I can just look at her and tell:
    Low IQ
    Has a bag of Cheetos in left hand desk drawer, wet wipes for orange powder on fingers when boss walks by
    Always has a GINORMOUS mug of some beverage to suck on all day
    Brings the peanut-butter cookies to the office snack parties
    Could not tell you who Khalid al Mansour was if her life depended on it, will call you a racist if you corner her stupidity
    Drives a schmarmy sedan to work
    Yep, typical self-loathing self-flagellating, permanent victim, low IQ, entitlement-driven blame-baby supporter of this communist.



    and you know who wants to join them, the Narcissistic Personality Disordered BARRY SOETORO, O-FRAUD

    I think your website has invented O-bug spray

  13. take back, thats hilarious…

    bag of cheetos, wet wipes, hahaha

  14. takebackAmericaNOW

    Catherine wrote: “I think this blog and the people who post on it are pretty nuts. The court’s should sanction your frivolous petitions. grow up and get over the election. If you want to be real patriots, embrace your new president or go back to putting tin foil under your hats so the noise from Martians won’t be soooooo loud.”

    I feel so punished! She used “nuts, grow up, get over it,, tinfoil hats, martians” AND a threat!
    Then she beckons us to “embrace” O-fraud while he disassembles our country, bankrupts its treasuries, devalues the dollar, gives up her sovereignty, purposefully endangers her to attacks, removes her pride, removes our freedoms, censors our very words with ever growing fascism, removes all modes to prosperity, punishes those who do prosper, and discriminates against European-Americans.
    Um, NO.

  15. Ted

    The current SCOTUS threshold for a MUST STAY of BHO’s inauguration is not whether he is ultimately determined constitutionally ineligible to be POTUS, merely whether there now is SERIOUS QUESTION on his constitutional eligibility, since any determination of inelligibility AFTER inauguration would pose unnecessary civil and military difficulties.

  16. Chris

    Well guess you lost the war, Obama is on office and running the country much better than those lying, throw rights in the trash, responsible for 911 bastards. Word of advice, get a gallon of gas and a match, pour the gas on your body, starting from your head down, now smile and light the match!

    Now if we can convince the other half of your idiots to do the same thing America will be a much better place.


  17. Hi just me again, everyone who made a comment on Barry in 2009 hit the target perfect. And then here comes chris – Jan 14 – 2010 . Get your head out of barrys soetoro’s butt. Your begining to stink . You know your communist dicator is a criminal from way way back, in Chicago when he had Retzo launder million of dollors. True 100% american’s are winners. You are the loser. You just can’t stand hearing the truth about this scumbucket who really stocked pile his bank account, and s0ld the U.S. down the river. Barry is anti- American, a racist, a marxist, a communist and the biggest pathological liar on the face of the planet. We are never going to have jobs for all the poor people who got laid off. He dose’t give a dam about America or us whitie’s ( like the words Michelle Obama called us. He is hell bent on getting this country killed so he can have a one world order. He keeps forgetting that Our one and only God is still in control. Our enemies are stocking their arsenal – and Jocko – Ass wants us to put ours away so we can’t defend ourselves . And it’s not if we get hit, it’s just a matter of when. !!! – Grow uo Chris – God save and giveus back our country. Love all of you out there and still prayingfor the world. May God have mercy on us all. dede

obambi.com ---> Talk back, don't let them hold you down...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s